Compare CMS CJR three-year extension, CJR-X and TEAM side by side
See how three CMS episode-based payment models differ across participation, episode design, target pricing, risk adjustment, quality measures and reconciliation.
Download the CMS payment model comparison
Complete the form to access the white paper and review the differences among the CJR three-year extension, CJR-X and TEAM.
By submitting this form, you agree to receive occasional marketing emails from DataGen. We will not share or sell your information.
What’s inside
This white paper is built for hospital finance, compliance and strategy leaders who need a fast reference for how these mandatory CMS models overlap, differ and affect organizational planning.
How the models compare
Review the structure of each model, including authority, participation scope, timing and episode length.
Where financial exposure begins
See when downside risk starts, how stop-loss rules differ and what hospitals should monitor across performance years.
Risk adjustment and quality measures
Understand how beneficiary factors, hospital characteristics and quality scoring shape performance under each model.
What to watch next
Track the cross-model rules, participation changes and operational implications that deserve attention as CJR-X and TEAM overlap.
CJR-XcellenceSM, CJR-X Model Analytics
Bundled payment analytics partner since 2012.
Ready for the CJR-X mandatory nationwide expansion.
